Mort's Report — Sports Data Analytics
← Back to the schedule

Week 2 · Sun, 4:05 PM EDT · CBS

Las Vegas Raiders at Los Angeles Chargers

SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, CA

Las Vegas Raiders
Raiders
LV
3-14 · #32
55%
LAC to win
LAC -1.5 · Coin flip
Los Angeles Chargers
Chargers
LAC
11-6 · #15

Market line for comparison: LAC -6.5 · O/U 43.5 (DraftKings). The model never sees this.

Rating inputs

Each starting rating is a weighted blend of five real football inputs, not just wins and losses. Every term below is measured from the 2025 season.

Las Vegas Raiders

InputRatingWeightContribution
Elo from results
3-14 in 2025, opponent-adjusted
137480%1099.2
Scoring strength
241–432 points (-191.0 differential) → 20.1% expected win rate
12605%63.0
Late-season form
same replay with the closing 6 weeks counted double
131515%197.2
Offense / defense split
14.2 PPG scored, 25.4 allowed → offense 1279, defense 1440
12190%0.0
Blended 2025 rating1359.4
Offseason regression
25% back toward the 1500 league mean
1394.6
Roster / QB adjustment
No offseason adjustment applied.
0.0
LV 2026 starting rating1395

Los Angeles Chargers

InputRatingWeightContribution
Elo from results
11-6 in 2025, opponent-adjusted
151180%1208.5
Scoring strength
368–340 points (+28.0 differential) → 54.7% expected win rate
15335%76.6
Late-season form
same replay with the closing 6 weeks counted double
149515%224.3
Offense / defense split
21.6 PPG scored, 20.0 allowed → offense 1466, defense 1575
15410%0.0
Blended 2025 rating1509.4
Offseason regression
25% back toward the 1500 league mean
1507.1
Roster / QB adjustment
No offseason adjustment applied.
0.0
LAC 2026 starting rating1507

The calculation

Every term the model applies, in order, from both teams' starting ratings to the number on the card.

Los Angeles Chargers base rating
1459.1
2026 starting Elo, after offseason regression
Las Vegas Raiders base rating
− 1443.5
2026 starting Elo, after offseason regression
Rating edge (home perspective)
+15.6
LAC is the better-rated side on neutral ground
Home-field advantage
+25.0
Flat 25 points for every host
Rest differential
+0.0
Both teams open the season equally rested
Analyst override
+0.0
No manual adjustment on this game
Injury adjustment
−7.5
LAC is the more banged-up side — see the injury breakdown below
Adjusted Elo difference
+33.1

Win probability

1 / (1 + 10−(33.1 / 400))

54.8% LAC

Model spread

33.1 ÷ 25, rounded to the nearest half point

LAC -1.5

Confidence band

Coin flip · under 55%Lean · 55–65%Confident · 65–75%Strong · 75% and up

Injury adjustment

Report pulled 2026-10-27 13:20 UTC

Ratings describe a team over a whole season. Who is actually available on Sunday is a separate question, so the injury adjustment is applied last, after home field and rest. Each listed player costs a share of a point of spread based on his position, whether he starts, and how likely he is to play.

Before injuries

55.8%

LAC by 1.5

Injury term

−7.5 Elo

−0.3 pts of spread, home perspective

After injuries

54.8%

LAC by 1.5 · moved 1.1 pts of probability

Las Vegas Raiders

−0.3 pts

  • Carter Runyon TEOut−0.10
  • Jack Bech WROut−0.10
  • Dont'e Thornton Jr. WROut−0.10
  • Patrick Johnson DEQuestionable−0.03

Los Angeles Chargers

−0.5 pts

  • Alec Ingold FBOut−0.10
  • Denzel Perryman LBOut−0.10
  • Rodney Shelley CBQuestionable−0.03
  • Tre' Harris WRQuestionable−0.03

Statuses come straight from the league injury report: out and injured reserve count in full, doubtful three quarters, questionable roughly a third, probable a tenth. Starters are identified from the depth chart; anyone the model cannot place is treated as a backup.

Move the factors yourself

Every term feeds one number: the adjusted Elo difference. Drag any of them and watch the spread and confidence follow.

1459

Drag to see how much a stronger or weaker host changes the call.

1443

The two ratings only matter through their difference.

+25 pts

The tuned value is a flat 25 points for every host.

+0 pts

5 Elo per extra day of rest, capped at 25 either way.

+0 pts

A manual thumb on the scale, in the home team's direction.

Win probability

55.8% LAC

Model value

Model spread

LAC -1.5

Elo diff +40.6 · Lean

Probability curve

The logistic curve from −600 to +600 Elo, home perspective. The dot is your current setting; the faint vertical line is where the model itself sits. Notice the curve is flattest at the extremes — near a coin flip, every point of Elo moves the number most.

Where the ratings came from

Each rating is the end state of a full 2025 season of Elo updates, regressed toward the league mean for the new season.

Las Vegas Raiders
Las Vegas Raiders
#32 of 32 · 3-14 in 2025
2025 final rating
1374.0
Regress 25% toward 1500
+20.5
2026 starting rating
1394.6

2025 Elo trail

Biggest swings

  • L 10–34 vs NYG−46.7
  • L 16–33 vs DAL−40.6
  • L 10–24 vs CLE−39.5
Los Angeles Chargers
Los Angeles Chargers
#15 of 32 · 11-6 in 2025
2025 final rating
1510.7
Regress 25% toward 1500
−3.6
2026 starting rating
1507.1

2025 Elo trail

Biggest swings

  • L 6–35 at JAX−57.7
  • L 10–27 vs WSH−48.4
  • W 37–10 vs MIN+45.4

Matchup factors

Everything beyond the two base ratings that moved this specific number.

Home field

+25.0 pts

worth 3.6 points of win probability

LAC hosts at SoFi Stadium. Every host gets the same flat 25 points — the model does not rate crowds individually.

Rest

+0.0 pts

Both teams come in on equal rest, so there is no rest edge to give.

Analyst override

+0.0 pts

No manual adjustment. The number here is pure model output.

2025 head to head

  • Week 2: LAC won 20–9 (LAC on the road)
  • Week 13: LAC won 31–14 (LAC at home)

Strength of schedule

Who each team actually played in 2025, measured by their opponents' current ratings. This is context for reading the ratings — it is not an input to the prediction above, because beating good teams already raises a team's Elo more.

Las Vegas Raiders

1505

average opponent rating · 12th toughest of 32

vs above-average teams
1-8
vs below-average teams
2-6
Los Angeles Chargers

1488

average opponent rating · 29th toughest of 32

vs above-average teams
4-3
vs below-average teams
7-3

What the model does not know

  • · How an injury actually plays out — the adjustment above prices availability, not how well a replacement performs.
  • · Coaching and roster turnover between seasons.
  • · Weather, travel distance and short-week fatigue beyond raw rest days.
  • · Anything a betting market has priced in since the season ended.
Read the full methodology →